View experiment →
The Halden Weave
Turned a 40-year alumni mailing list into a signed trust graph. Mentor matches now route through provenance instead of broadcast.
Alumni network · Signed intros
A signed fabric of relationships, provenance, and portable reputation — woven by the people who actually know each other, so every introduction carries its own weight.
A short point of view from us on why the network became loud, why trust got quiet, and how a fabric of signed relationships puts weight back behind an introduction. But first, here's some work:
View community story →
A trust graph for a 300-member founders' collective.
Network / Trust Graph
View community story →
Provenance-verified intros between LPs and portfolio operators.
Investor Network
View community story →
Reputation-weighted matchmaking for a private dinner club.
Community
View community story →
A verified alumni fabric spanning four decades of graduates.
Alumni
View community story →
Signed endorsements woven into every warm introduction.
Operator Guild
View community story →
A supplier-of-record fabric for a global hardware network.
Enterprise
We spent years building rooms — bringing the right people together, making introductions, watching trust form in real time. It worked. But the better the community got, the harder it became to keep the fabric alive. The introductions multiplied, the context thinned, and the signal slowly drowned in its own noise.
TrueWeave grew out of that friction. The same conviction — that a warm introduction is the most valuable object in a network — but with trust made explicit. Two people sign one relationship, provenance travels with the ask, and the fabric holds even when the hosts step out of the room.
Anyone can be reached now, and everyone knows it. The inbox is loud, the intro is cheap, and the polite yes has replaced the real one. Point a graph at a person and it returns a list of the plausible — competent enough, and instantly forgettable.
Which is why weight stopped being volume. It is provenance — who signed for this ask, who is on the other end of it, and whether they meant it. The last ten percent of a good introduction is the whole thing, and it's the part a directory has never been able to do.
Listing every plausible name, filtering by tag, and getting a competent first candidate in front of you.
Knowing which of those names actually vouches for you, and having the nerve to route the ask away from the rest.
The members make the edges, the fabric makes the calls. In practice that works out to roughly 40 percent attesting, 20 weaving, 30 routing, 10 proving.
A relationship becomes real when both people sign it — with context, not a checkbox.
Signed edges compound. Provenance is inherited from the fabric, never invented.
Warm asks travel to the person best placed — and most willing — to help.
Every intro leaves a receipt. What works strengthens the edge; what doesn't retires it.
Every network we weave ends up with one. A single source that holds the members, the signed edges, and the rules — written so a person and a machine can both read it. It's what we route from, and what we check every intro against.
The one place that holds every signed edge, every attestation, every retraction — the source we route from.
Skills, contexts, and willingness — the things a member has agreed the fabric can act on.
A warm ask, delivered to the right person by the shortest signed path — not the loudest one.
A score on every intro, and what it learns folds back into the ledger.
This is the other half of what we do. Trust adoption has levels, a bit like self-driving cars: at one end an admin is exporting a CSV, at the other the fabric routes whole asks on its own. Most networks are idling in the spreadsheet phase, and we help you move up a level at a time.
A list of names. Nothing compounds. Everyone starts here.
Searchable, tagged, curated by an admin. Better, but the trust still lives outside it.
Every relationship is signed, every intro carries provenance. The network holds itself up.
We know where the line is, and we'll happily talk you out of the "trust score" idea that's going to embarrass you in six months.
Every edge in the graph is signed by both people. No unilateral 'connections.'
Where an ask originated, who vouched for it, and when it changed hands.
Members carry earned reputation across the networks they belong to.
Double opt-in by design. Warmth measured, not assumed.
Drop TrueWeave into a community platform, CRM, or member app.
Zero-knowledge attestations. The network sees the fabric, not the fibres.
We run small pilots with networks that want to move up the levels of trust. Here are three we learned from.
View experiment →
Turned a 40-year alumni mailing list into a signed trust graph. Mentor matches now route through provenance instead of broadcast.
Alumni network · Signed intros
View experiment →
180 operators, one private ledger, six months of measuring warmth against outcome. The fabric outperformed cold intros by a clear margin.
Operator network · Warmth scoring
View experiment →
A tiny format that travels with an intro so the chain of ask, vouch, and agreement stays intact across handoffs.
Intro design · Provenance
We're a small studio scattered across a handful of time zones, so the odds are decent that one of us is awake and somewhere near you. Part workshop, mostly ledger, and always happiest with a network worth weaving.
Request an intro →