TrueWeave
Vol. 001Index / Truth, woven

Truth,woven.

Fig. 01 — Loom sample

A signed fabric of relationships, provenance, and portable reputation — woven by the people who actually know each other, so every introduction carries its own weight.

Point of view

A short point of view from us on why the network became loud, why trust got quiet, and how a fabric of signed relationships puts weight back behind an introduction. But first, here's some work:

Selected communitiesView all communities →
Where we come from

Born from running communities, and facing the same problem.

We spent years building rooms — bringing the right people together, making introductions, watching trust form in real time. It worked. But the better the community got, the harder it became to keep the fabric alive. The introductions multiplied, the context thinned, and the signal slowly drowned in its own noise.

TrueWeave grew out of that friction. The same conviction — that a warm introduction is the most valuable object in a network — but with trust made explicit. Two people sign one relationship, provenance travels with the ask, and the fabric holds even when the hosts step out of the room.

What changed

Networks got good at volume. Trust didn't come with it.

Anyone can be reached now, and everyone knows it. The inbox is loud, the intro is cheap, and the polite yes has replaced the real one. Point a graph at a person and it returns a list of the plausible — competent enough, and instantly forgettable.

Which is why weight stopped being volume. It is provenance — who signed for this ask, who is on the other end of it, and whether they meant it. The last ten percent of a good introduction is the whole thing, and it's the part a directory has never been able to do.

Directories are brilliant at

Listing every plausible name, filtering by tag, and getting a competent first candidate in front of you.

Hopeless at

Knowing which of those names actually vouches for you, and having the nerve to route the ask away from the rest.

How the loom works

Attest. Weave. Route. Prove.

The members make the edges, the fabric makes the calls. In practice that works out to roughly 40 percent attesting, 20 weaving, 30 routing, 10 proving.

01 · Attest

A relationship becomes real when both people sign it — with context, not a checkbox.

02 · Weave

Signed edges compound. Provenance is inherited from the fabric, never invented.

03 · Route

Warm asks travel to the person best placed — and most willing — to help.

04 · Prove

Every intro leaves a receipt. What works strengthens the edge; what doesn't retires it.

The product inside the loom

The Trust Fabric Protocol.

Every network we weave ends up with one. A single source that holds the members, the signed edges, and the rules — written so a person and a machine can both read it. It's what we route from, and what we check every intro against.

01 · Truth Ledger

The one place that holds every signed edge, every attestation, every retraction — the source we route from.

02 · Signals

Skills, contexts, and willingness — the things a member has agreed the fabric can act on.

03 · Routes

A warm ask, delivered to the right person by the shortest signed path — not the loudest one.

04 · Weight

A score on every intro, and what it learns folds back into the ledger.

Passing it on

Move your network up the levels of trust.

This is the other half of what we do. Trust adoption has levels, a bit like self-driving cars: at one end an admin is exporting a CSV, at the other the fabric routes whole asks on its own. Most networks are idling in the spreadsheet phase, and we help you move up a level at a time.

  • L1Rolodex.

    A list of names. Nothing compounds. Everyone starts here.

  • L3Directory.

    Searchable, tagged, curated by an admin. Better, but the trust still lives outside it.

  • L5Fabric.

    Every relationship is signed, every intro carries provenance. The network holds itself up.

We know where the line is, and we'll happily talk you out of the "trust score" idea that's going to embarrass you in six months.

Six capabilities

Not a directory.
A fabric.

01/ 06

Verified relationships

Every edge in the graph is signed by both people. No unilateral 'connections.'

02/ 06

Provenance of intent

Where an ask originated, who vouched for it, and when it changed hands.

03/ 06

Reputation, portable

Members carry earned reputation across the networks they belong to.

04/ 06

Consent-first intros

Double opt-in by design. Warmth measured, not assumed.

05/ 06

Weave API

Drop TrueWeave into a community platform, CRM, or member app.

06/ 06

Private by default

Zero-knowledge attestations. The network sees the fabric, not the fibres.

From the loom room

Experiments in trust.

We run small pilots with networks that want to move up the levels of trust. Here are three we learned from.

View experiment →

The Halden Weave

Turned a 40-year alumni mailing list into a signed trust graph. Mentor matches now route through provenance instead of broadcast.

Alumni network · Signed intros

View experiment →

Operator Guild pilot

180 operators, one private ledger, six months of measuring warmth against outcome. The fabric outperformed cold intros by a clear margin.

Operator network · Warmth scoring

View experiment →

Provenance receipts

A tiny format that travels with an intro so the chain of ask, vouch, and agreement stays intact across handoffs.

Intro design · Provenance

Get in touch.

We're a small studio scattered across a handful of time zones, so the odds are decent that one of us is awake and somewhere near you. Part workshop, mostly ledger, and always happiest with a network worth weaving.

Request an intro →